Newsletter
SAVE THE DATE

@theC100 on Twitter
 
C100 on Flickr
Monday
Feb132012

The C100 February Newsletter

Want to stay up to date with all things in the C100 community? Check out our latest newsletter which includes information on the C100UK, startups+movies, 48hrs in the Valley recap, 48hrs Alumni in the news, Charter Member shout outs, the C100 interns, accelerators, tips from our friends, and recent success stories on acquisitions and funding. To read the C100's February Newsletter and to check out previous ones, see the C100 Newsletter page

Tuesday
Jan172012

Michael Worry: Silicon Valley's moose on the loose

Written by Anthony Reinhart, staff writer at Communitech. This was originally posted on the Communitech website here.

 

Michael Worry and daughters Morgan, 4 (left), and Megan, 6, with their new, zero-emissions Nissan Leaf. Megan insisted on a red car in honour of her dad's Canadian roots.

If cars were people, the Nissan Leaf would be a Canadian: Clever, efficient and quiet to a fault.

Michael Worry, Leaf owner, knows these are fine qualities in a car. As an engineer and entrepreneur, he appreciates its innovative technology, and as a California commuter, he certainly knows the value of clean air, not to mention fuel.

But, when it comes to his actual fellow Canadians, Worry feels it’s time to add bold, brave and even brash to the repertoire.

His reasoning is simple: Canadian entrepreneurs are letting their trademark caution get in the way of opportunities.

Nowhere is this more evident than in the tech mecca of Silicon Valley, where Worry launched his electronic product design and manufacturing firm, Nuvation Engineering, in 1997.

He now helps others do the same through the C100, a volunteer group of influential Canadians in California determined to plant the Maple Leaf at the centre of the tech universe. Worry also helps direct the Digital Moose Lounge, a networking group for the estimated 300,000 Canadians in the San Francisco Bay area, and keeps its mascot – a life-size moose statue – at his company’s offices.

When Worry landed in San Jose as a young University of Waterloo grad, he quickly found not only that he could compete with the Valley’s best, but that being Canadian gave him an advantage.

“When you say to an American that you’re a Canadian, you’re actually put a notch up, because it means ‘I know I can trust you; I know you’ll work hard; I know you’re smart’,” said Worry, whose company employs about 100 people split evenly between San Jose and Waterloo.

“I’m not saying Canadians should start cutting people off in traffic and ruin the mystique,” he said, “but I’m saying they should be willing to ask for the money, be willing to ask for the order, be willing to politely suggest a completely different viewpoint.”

Worry learned these lessons soon after he graduated from UW’s electrical engineering program. His head was full of marketable ideas, but his face was too fresh for cautious Canadian customers.

“I originally tried to get Nuvation started in Ontario, and couldn’t get traction and sales calls for an entrepreneur of my age,” he said, wheeling his whisper-quiet Leaf – red like the Maple Leaf, at the insistence of his six-year-old daughter – through San Jose. “Then I did sales calls into Silicon Valley, and no one cared how old I was, so I moved down to California.”

When they landed, Worry and business partner Geoff White, a fellow UW grad, were long on enthusiasm but short on everything else: They had no money or connections, and little inclination to tangle with venture capitalists.

Their bootstrap solution arrived in the mailbox of their shared apartment, in the form of what most of us consider junk mail: credit card applications. They started filling them out and were soon on their way.

The late 1990s were a different time, of course; it’s doubtful today that a couple of Canadians without U.S. credit histories, income or social security numbers could amass more than a dozen cards, run up the balances and fund a startup, as Worry and White did.

“I can tell this story now because it worked; I don’t know if I’d coach other entrepreneurs to do this,” Worry said with a grin, “but we racked up a quarter-million dollars in credit-card debt.”

Wasn’t the high interest crippling?

“No, because we did it all on zero-per-cent introductory offers,” he explained, and they made sure, with help from a spreadsheet, to transfer the balances to new cards as the interest-free periods on the older ones wound down. “You know, we’re engineers, and we pay attention.”

In late 2000, they sold the company with what appears, in hindsight, to be brilliant timing, just before the tech bubble burst in early 2001.

White moved on, but Worry stayed with Nuvation as the new owners struggled to rebound from the crash. In 2002, he began to envision a way forward by expanding the company, but his boss, though “a great guy,” felt further cutbacks were his only option.

“I didn’t think that was the right plan,” Worry recalled, “and so he said, ‘If you believe in the company that strongly, you should buy it back’, and I said, ‘Okay, actually we’ll do that’.”

Worry reacquired Nuvation for “pennies on the dollar” of the original sale price, and didn’t look back.

He and his family live in California, but he returns often to his Waterloo office, opened in 2004 to take advantage of UW engineering talent. Worry also serves on Communitech’s board of directors.

His experience as a tech entrepreneur in both places affords him a unique perspective on the peculiarities of the two business environments.

In addition to their image as trustworthy, loyal and nice, Canadians – especially UW grads – are known throughout Silicon Valley for their talent and diligence, he said.

“We’ve consistently found that co-op students out of Waterloo are much more equipped to deal with the real world because they’ve had the co-op experience,” said Worry, half of whose San Jose employees are Canadians. “For some reason, America hasn’t done that. I’ve interviewed new grads from engineering schools here who have never had a job.”

On the other hand, Americans are more accepting of entrepreneurship and its attendant risks – which might explain why the U.S. is still reeling from a financial crisis and Canadian banks remain strong, but also why someone like Worry was able, at age 23, to conjure a successful company out of imagination, chutzpah and a wallet full of plastic.

Canadians who want to build great companies need to overcome their cultural inclination, reinforced by the doubters around them, to suppress that kind of audacity, Worry said.

At a conference in Toronto last year, an attendee asked Worry what he should do about friends and family who didn’t understand why he wanted to start a business.

“And my answer was, ‘You ignore them’,” he said. “That’s the entrepreneur’s job, to not pay attention to people who don’t understand what entrepreneurship is.”

He attributes these doubts to the “crab mentality,” in reference to the way crabs in a bucket behave. If one crab tries to get out, the others will pull it back in as if to say, ‘Stay here with us, it’s safer. Don’t go over the wall.’ (Canadian rapper k-os lamented this same phenomenon in his 2004 hit, Crabbuckit.)

“It’s the entrepreneur who pole-vaults over the 10-foot wall and says, ‘I get that you guys aren’t going to follow me and I’m okay with that’,” Worry said.

He acknowledged it’s “kind of un-Canadian” to ignore naysayers, but in Silicon Valley, an abundance of doubters “usually means you’re on to something pretty good,” and failed startup attempts are worn as badges of honour, not shame.

“They’re like, ‘Yeah, we started this; it turned out we were a year ahead of the market, burned $5 million in VC funding and then we shut it down’,” he said. “And that’s okay; that’s not a problem.”

Worry’s experience has instilled a strong belief that Canadians need to do a better job of promoting entrepreneurship to children as a legitimate career choice, alongside the safer occupations parents and teachers typically encourage.

In high-school guidance classes, he said, “They don’t have a column for entrepreneur, and it’s actually a profession that has its own style to it and skill set and required personality traits and so forth.”

He applauded Communitech for doing just that through its in-school programs, and UW’s VeloCity “dormcubator” approach to melding higher education with entrepreneurialism.

Worry encouraged established and aspiring entrepreneurs in Waterloo Region to take the step and spend some time in Silicon Valley, not just to make contacts and land customers, but to soak up the can-do culture and bring it back to Canada.

“Culture isn’t just something you can write on a wall and just shift; it comes out of observing behaviours and interactions,” said Worry, who notices “there’s not the same level of aggression and boldness in the room” when he attends meetings in Canada.

“I don’t know how to make a big shift on that without encouraging further collaboration and interaction between those cultures,” he said.

Canadians who take him up on his suggestion stand to reap considerable rewards, given the abundance of Valley-based Canadians ready to help them.

In addition to the C100 and Digital Moose Lounge, consular officials in San Francisco and Palo Alto are available to help connect Canadians to opportunities in California.

Worry also strongly encouraged Canadian tech companies to consider hiring American salespeople to tout their products and services in the Valley, where potential customers are everywhere.

“If many mid-size companies came down here and were willing to make the expense and have a person here, I think they would get a good sales and marketing return out of that,” he said.

“It’s only upside.”

Friday
Jan062012

48 Hours in the Valley… 31 Days Later 

Written by Aidan Nulman, Co-founder and CEO of Winston, Inc. 

Of all of the startup and technology events I attended in 2011, the C100's 48 Hours in the Valley was by far the most valuable. In fact, it was one of the most important "moments" in my company Winston's still-short history (second only to our incubation with The Next 36).

After one month of reflection, I've identified the three key ingredients to my successful experience at 48 Hours. And—surprise, surprise—all of them are about the people.

Winston, has been categorized as ambitious and tenacious since our inception (itself a noteworthy story). The C100's ability to connect the most promising Canadian entrepreneurs—a distinction which our company is still working to live up to—not only to their peers, but to the best mentors and investors the valley has to offer is unparalleled.

So screw the festivities (which were both plentiful and wonderful), the activities (which were both exciting and inspiring), and the scenery (which were beautiful and awesome, in the truest sense of the word). What it really came down to was the people:

1) Our fellow entrepreneurs

Having the opportunity to learn from juggernauts like Jevon MacDonald, Gavin Uhma (GoInstant), and Joseph Fung (TribeHR) was amazing. Their successes so far, and the many more sure to come, were like a guiding light for me. I learned as much watching them work the event as I have from all of the books and articles I've read this year.

2) The mentors

We also got to rub shoulders and learn from people who have "made it through the jungle." I learned a lot from Joel Scott and his experience operating Autonomy all the way to exit. I found what seemed to be a kindred spirit in William Plut—as soon as we sat down, I was asked a solid hour's worth of well-thought-out questions about what and why we're doing, along with recommendations whenever an answer wasn't satisfactory. You know mentors are doing their jobs right when you leave the room feeling both accomplished and with a world of improvement left to go. 

3) The investors

Why are you not surprised. The investors the C100 brought to the room were absolutely top-notch, and a pleasure to talk with. They have a ton to teach, especially when it comes down to pattern recognition. Again, I learned a ton, and now have a number of meetings either already set up or about to be for our first institutional round (which is why I'm not naming names this time…).

3.5) The organizers

Ha! I bet you thought I'd leave them out. To me, the mark of any good event are people who actually give a damn, and the C100 has that in spades. When you talk with Chris Albinson, Anthony Lee, Atlee Clark, Camille Meyers-Jones, Debbie Landa, and Michael Wozniak, you can really feel how much they care… not only for the organization, but for you and your company.

To conclude: I've been to a number of C100 events before. I've always loved the organization, their mission, and everyone involved. With 48 Hours, I stopped seeing the C100 as simply an amazing interest group and started seeing it for what it is: a fantastic resource for every Canadian entrepreneur.

And to every entrepreneur reading this, whether or not you're Canadian, I'll leave you with one piece of advice: when you go to SV, do everything you can to get paraded around town by people you respect. This was my third (and shortest) visit, and it was by far the most productive for this reason.

 

--Aidan

 

P.S. In all of the categories above, I've definitely offended someone by leaving them out. For that I'm incredibly sorry, and I owe you a beer.

Tuesday
Jan032012

Pt. 4 of Globe & Mail series on 48hrs: Jason Morehouse of Checkfront

Over the holidays, Jason Morehouse wrapped up the four part series of 48hrs in the Valley with his article "In the Valley, startup finds honest feedback and advice". Jason is the co-founder of Checkfront, and participated in the first C100 48hrs in the Valley back in May 2010. As over a year and a half has passed since his experience at 48hrs, Jason recalls what his intentions were and what resulted afterwards: 

"Without any pre-conceived expectations, I was there simply to soak up as much information as I could, meet as many contacts as possible and then return to Vancouver Island and pick up where I left off. But this event would end up directly changing our business model and help point us to success."

To read the whole article, check it out here: http://www.theglobeandmail.com/report-on-business/small-business/sb-money/business-funding/in-the-valley-startup-finds-honest-feedback-and-advice/article2285051/

As this series is over, we want to give a big thanks to the folks at the Globe and Mail for focusing on our events and to the 48hrs alumni who shared what they got out of their time with us in the Valley!

Wednesday
Dec212011

How to be a Great Mentor

Written by Jeremy Toeman. Jeremy is the Chief Product Officer at Dijit Media, Founder of NudgeMail, Founder of Legacy Locker, Founder and Strategic Advicor of Stage Two, and is on the C100 Organizing Committee.

 Jeremy Toeman at 2010 Grow Conference in Vancouver

Let's face it, running companies is tough.  Really tough.  We all need a little help from time to time, whether this is our first startup or our tenth.  Unlike when I started my first company back in the mid-90's, there's free flowing advice all over the Internet.  But not all advice is appropriate for all companies, and that's where industry knowledge, experience, and expertise matter, and I'd make the claim that there's not a business leader on the planet who couldn't use some form of mentor from time to time.

Personally, in my roles at Stage Two500Startupsthe C100, and Founder Fuel, I've acted as a mentor for literally dozens of companies, both big and small.  I really enjoy the process of getting to know the team behind a new venture, learn about their goals, their ambition, and their vision.  It's the latter that makes up a key starting point in any mentoring session - understanding vision. I feel most startups are clear on their business, their tech, their product, their market, but can rarely clearly articulate vision.  My #1 tip to all entrepreneurs (first time or tenth time) is to watchthis TEDtalk by Simon Sinek.  To mentors - think about your role, your process, your learnings over the years and figure out your own "must-do" items for the companies and teams you meet.

Whether formal or informally structured, I think another key thing entrepreneurs and mentors need to figure out is what they want to get out of the relationship.  Oftentimes I get brought into some strategy or brainstorming session, but nobody in the room has any goal or desired outcome.  The best way to get the most out of these structures is to know in advance what the targets are.  Then you can get right to work, dive into the product, the pitch deck, the business model, the marketing strategy, etc, and also have some form of expectation management.  This burden falls equally on the mentor to help guide the entrepreneurs as to what they *could* get out of the relationship.

It's important to know one's strengths.  I'm known for creating great product experiences, marketing strategy, etc, but also more specifically in the consumer technology field.  Sure, my experience and knowledge can lend itself to helping an enterprise company navigate some issue, but I'm sure I'd be better off finding that company someone with more pertinent advice.  There's tons of smart people out there, so try to find the ones who have directly tangible experience to what it is you are doing.  And to the mentors, ditto - yes, you can probably help lots of companies, but you as well should try to focus your energy on the companies you are best suited for.

It's just as important to know one's resources.  I'm a father of young children and work at a startup.  I don't have much time on my hands.  So when a company asks for my help, I'm typically pretty clear about my availability with them.  Everyone has constraints, so both to entrepreneurs and potential mentors - make sure these are well communicated.

Lastly, and probably most importantly: expect brutal honesty.  I open every new relationship by saying "I trust you have friends and family to tell you how amazing you are and how this startup will change the world.  That's not my job."  There's a great blog post on "stop being so nice" here, and I agree with it all the way.  I'm not mentoring when I'm ignoring flaws in the business model, or go-to-market strategy.  I'm not being helpful when I say the app "has potential."  It's when I help dive into these issues, and keep asking the "why is that true?" or "and how exactly will you do that?" questions that I'm being a good mentor.  

Now, be careful not to berate.  Startups have their boards to be on their ass about whatever mistakes they are making.  The mentor's the coach, the "go give em hell, tiger" person - once the path is clear, that is.  I make sure to toe the line well between finding (and attempting to fix) problems before they happen, then help right the course when the problems do happen.  You never want to feel bad leaving a mentoring session, but as I said earlier, you aren't the cheerleader either.

Finding and/or being a great mentor is a challenge.  But it's one well-worth taking.